They say the digital book revolution is upon us, that in a few more years everybody reading a dead-tree book will be silly, people with bookshelves fetishists and soon after that we’ll arrange witch hunts against anyone even thinking about killing a tree for t heir amusement.
They also say 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 is the year of the linux desktop.
They also say the internets will kill the music, movies, television, newspaper, book et al. industries … oh no wait that was the 1990’s.
They also say television will slaughter the radio … no wait, that was the 1960’s.
They also say movies will slaughter proper theatres … no wait, that was the 1930’s.
Excuse me while I let out a big hearty LOL in the corner.
Alright, enough making fun, let’s see some pros and cons about e-book readers because, honestly, there’s a lot of good about them, but nevertheless it’s going to take a while before I even consider buying one.
The biggest advantage of book readers is that they’re a compact form for storing texts, easily transportable and so on and so on. This is also their biggest weakness compared to books and the reason why they suck.
Compare reading a book to reading a sterile book reader will you. In a book your fingers interact with the text, the paper’s texture, thickness even the smell, they all tell you something about the book. You’re likely to disregard a cheaply printed book as stupid and a quality book you’ll instantly have more respect for. In a book reader they’re all the same, one can be The Great Gatsby or Nineteen-eighty-four and the other some sort of Da Vinci Code but they will all look equally stupid. Granted, paperbacks suffer a bit from the same problem.
And not to mention, instead of flipping pages in a book reader you press buttons, at best perform gestures with fingers. This will never change because that would defeat the whole purpose of having a reader.
Which brings us to the next point – book thickness. In a reader all books live in the two dimensional world, but real books are three dimensional. Now I don’t know about you, but personally I find it very important to judge when I will attempt reading a book by how thick/big it is. You won’t tackle a Ulysses during the toughest of exam seasons, but something like Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas is just perfect.
Not to even mention the benefits of time estimates when you’re studying and don’t have to do mental juggling to notice you should start reading this or that textbook very early and which can wait a bit.
Oh and there’s just something instantly gratifying about seeing how much you’ve read, the number 100 in the bottom-left corner is just stupid data, but feeling with your hands that you’re half-way through. Now that’s quality information.
The name of the game is tactile feedback!
But not all is lost for e-readers as there is a certain application I would use them for – storyless books.
Let me explain, there are millions of books out there that don’t contain a story. Everything from ‘tips&tricks in javascript’ to ‘becoming a better person 101′. They are all somewhat useless to read cover-to-cover and often get looked at in random locations or when you’re searching for something specific.
This is where a digital book excels, you can search, you can very very quickly scan through pages and with moderner e-readers you will even be able to make annotations.
However, for real literature, please dear e-readers, stay the fuck away from me.
And this is all simply taking for granted that e-readers will ever be as robust as books are. How many electronics do you know where half the contents can be missing and the rest still works perfectly? Or electronics that are still in mint condition 300 years since being made?