<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Splitting and merging django models with perfect transparency</title>
	<atom:link href="http://swizec.com/blog/splitting-and-merging-django-models-with-perfect-transparency/swizec/1178/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://swizec.com/blog/splitting-and-merging-django-models-with-perfect-transparency/swizec/1178</link>
	<description>Drinker of tea</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 13:03:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: sb</title>
		<link>http://swizec.com/blog/splitting-and-merging-django-models-with-perfect-transparency/swizec/1178/comment-page-1#comment-2289</link>
		<dc:creator>sb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 21:58:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://swizec.com/blog/?p=1178#comment-2289</guid>
		<description>Object store or key-value store for me, thank you very much.

Let&#039;s say there are 5 people writing for @hekovnik. What happens if 2 of them decide to share something as @hekovnik? If I understand correctly, you join their accounts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Object store or key-value store for me, thank you very much.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s say there are 5 people writing for @hekovnik. What happens if 2 of them decide to share something as @hekovnik? If I understand correctly, you join their accounts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Swizec</title>
		<link>http://swizec.com/blog/splitting-and-merging-django-models-with-perfect-transparency/swizec/1178/comment-page-1#comment-2288</link>
		<dc:creator>Swizec</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 21:15:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://swizec.com/blog/?p=1178#comment-2288</guid>
		<description>How would you do something like this without ORM? Change a bazillion SQL statements? Write a funky wrapper and force everyone to use it? (essentially this is a funky wrapper anyway, just doesn&#039;t break established patterns)

And I don&#039;t think I follow about nasty surprises and co-twiting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How would you do something like this without ORM? Change a bazillion SQL statements? Write a funky wrapper and force everyone to use it? (essentially this is a funky wrapper anyway, just doesn&#8217;t break established patterns)</p>
<p>And I don&#8217;t think I follow about nasty surprises and co-twiting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sb</title>
		<link>http://swizec.com/blog/splitting-and-merging-django-models-with-perfect-transparency/swizec/1178/comment-page-1#comment-2287</link>
		<dc:creator>sb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 20:48:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://swizec.com/blog/?p=1178#comment-2287</guid>
		<description>Goes to show how badly broken ORM pattern is.

On a more constructive note, doing this completely automagically &amp; transparently could lead to a very nasty surprise for people who co-twit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Goes to show how badly broken ORM pattern is.</p>
<p>On a more constructive note, doing this completely automagically &amp; transparently could lead to a very nasty surprise for people who co-twit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Served from: www.swizec.com @ 2013-05-23 13:45:13 by W3 Total Cache -->