As a power user, I want to punch you every time I change a setting

May 31 2012

Blogging burns a lot of caffeine. If you enjoy my posts, you should buy me a cup of tea.

English: Screenshot of the Unix Desktop Enviro...

A Unix Desktop Environment (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

“Screw the power users” wrote Nick Bradbury about catering both to power users and normal people. The more he improved his product and made it provably better, the more did power users complain about every new release and lost “feature”. Loudly.

Sales went up, but positive feedback went down.

His market targeting was off. But not in the way he thinks it was – the idea that power users need a lot of dials and knobs to play with to make a product juuuuust the way they like … is wrong.

I am a power user. When a piece of software fits me, I use it.

You know those mythical people who use your product every day, several hours a day, tell all their friends and publish blogs on the topic? That’s me. I’m that kind of power user.

I hate changing settings with a passion.

Software is a tool. I’m using it to do something. I don’t want to play around with the tools I use, I want to use them.

When your software makes me want to change a setting, I want to punch you in the face. Every time I want to punch you in the face you lose me a little bit as a user. Too many punches and I will leave in search of greener pastures, looking for a tool that fits my use case perfectly.

There was a time when most of my days were spent configuring everything I use to make it juuuust right. At 15 I discovered Linux. Linux is awesome because it gives you more than enough rope to hang yourself with.

I could spend hours upon hours making sure my desktop environment was using the perfect rendering engine. I would spend hours making sure all the effects were just right and that the toolbar was on the correct side and that my sound was just perfect and that the window decorations were perfect and …

Nowadays I don’t even change my wallpaper anymore. It took me two years to change the wallpaper on my iPhone from some random picture my sister set within 2 minutes of “Ooooh, can I look at your new phone?”

Tools should have defaults that are Good Enough ™. If the tools you make aren’t perfect out of the box, I will simply look for a tool where I’m the target user specifically.

Because when a maker is targeting me as the user, then I can put my trust in them (usually expressed in terms of a credit card transaction). I can be sure a tool won’t suddenly stop fulfilling my use case and go a different direction.

Being the target user is awesome.

In short, the more configuration you have, the less you know who your target customer is, the less confidence I have in you as a user.

Seriously?

Seriously?

Enhanced by Zemanta

---
Need a freelance developer? Email me!

You should follow me on twitter
 Subscribe to RSS

11 responses so far

  • http://prettygraph.com/ Hrishi Mittal
  • Matjaž Pečan

    I understand this. Make your product cater to the 80%. Forget the long tail.

    The question is…

    Does it have to be like that?
    Could you not cater to the long tail as well?

    Arguably you have to sink quite some time into catering to them as well, the configurators, the “meddlers”.

    Maybe you are overstating.
    Have you never been happy enough with something at first, some kind of setting, and then later, after some time, wanting it to change ever so slightly, even in a major way. What you want from the developer here is an un-natural amount of foresight. You expect him/her to know what you want in advance.

    The other side of the spectrum is simple to define: Apple. Walled garden, taking the default configuration to the point where the user is trapped. No choice…

  • Minhen Minhau

    That’s why some power users select a UNIX that doesn’t expect you to change settings at all: Mac OS X. ;)

  • http://swizec.com Swizec

    Haha, you got me there :D

  • http://swizec.com Swizec

    I don’t want the developer to know in advance what I want.

    I want a developer who understands the problem so much better than me, that their choices in features guide me. A developer that _tells me_ what I want. Because I’m too stupid to decide what’s best for me (most of the time, as a user, this is true … you’ve studied the software and field-of-work at least 10x as much as I have, you’ve simply put more thought into it)

    A good way to cater to everyone is how Adobe’s CS suite does it. You can decide whether you are Drawing, Animating, etc. and a preset of panels and tools is opened. The things they observed (through metrics) that people use most in unison when doing certain tasks.

    This is much better than forcing me to figure all of that out by myself, or putting more crap on my screen than gets used in unison.

  • Pingback: Links 1/6/2012: Tiny Linux-Powered PCs, LibreOffice 3.5.4 | Techrights

  • dsmithhfx

    You’re a power whinger with anger management issues. Get over yourself.

  • http://swizec.com Swizec

    Well … yeah, I write blogs don’t I? Pretty much comes with the definition.

  • http://taschenorakel.de/mathias/ Mathias Hasselmann

    Seriously? Seriously! Never in history developers got UX right on first try, and especially with out user feedback. Giving options reduces bad feedback noise. They permit interested interested people to try things out, and therefore _can_ help iterating to perfection faster. As you pointed out in your wallpaper example adult persons are able to ignore options they don’t need.

  • http://swizec.com Swizec

    Sure, have options I can ignore. Even make a nice “initial setup” thing where I set up the basics.

    But when I start feeling like I can’t use your software without tweaking settings, then there’s a problem of some sort or another. Maybe you need to add a feature, maybe I’m not the exact target user … or a number of other explanations. But it’s a symptom of a problem. (usually at least that the defaults aren’t good enough)

  • http://taschenorakel.de/mathias/ Mathias Hasselmann

    Fully agree. Btw, have you noticed Precise’s new display settings dialog? Seems they gradually move reasonable options into the control center and keep that frightening compiz tool as tweaker’s playground.

« Natural Language Generation system... Flotr2 – my favorite... »