Swizec Teller - a geek with a hatswizec.com

    A case for multi-tasking

    I just got out of a project managment and personal productivity exam. Having studied for it for almost a few hours I noticed an over-arching theme in the material: Never-ever ever multitask. Only ever do one thing. Don't you dare do more than one thing at a time!

    This also seems to be what a lot of the internet is saying about multi-tasking.

    Hell, some people have gone so far to say multi-tasking is bad as to perform some pretty heavy studies that all said that multi-tasking is bad and inevitably if you do decide to multi-task you're only hurting yourself, your brain and your productivity.

    But let me ask you something: When was the last time you sat down to do something and didn't stop for a few days, or even just more than 5 hours, until it was done?

    If the answer is never, then I'm afraid to tell you this, but you're a horrible multi-tasker and should be ashamed of yourself!

    Ashamed! You dirty multi-tasking bastard!

    "But that's not a task! You should break it down into sub-tasks!" I hear you cry, "You didn't break it down enough! A task is a complete thing that cannot be broken down into more tasks!"

    Fair point right there mister reader, but I'm afraid I have to disappoint you, everything can be broken down even more, while at the same time some things possibly can't be broken down at all.

    Let's look at, for example, reading Ulysses by James Joyce. Reading this book can be argued is a single task. But the notion of someone reading it in a single sitting is positively absurd since it's made up of roughly 700 pages, or at least the edition I have is. So, question is, are you a dirty multi-tasker if you don't read a 700 page book in a single sitting?

    I hope not.

    Ok let's try dividing the reading into subtasks. If you've taken a basic literature course in high school you probably know the book is comprised of three parts and that the general structure of the book goes from classical to more modern. Aha! Reading a part is a task. I can do that without interruption!

    But can you really, even if the parts were equally distributed that would make 230 pages per part. Can you read that in one sitting? Arguably, you could, I know I've done it, but it took something like 5 hours. Are you a dirty dirty multi-tasker if you don't read books in 5 hour chunks without stopping?

    Hopefully not, because that would make a lot of normal people feel very very bad about themselves. And let's not forget that part 3 of Ulysses contains five times as many episodes as the first and last part. It's divided into 18 episodes!

    Haha! An episode, yes, yes reading that is going to be a task. How absolutely brilliant! Now I can read roughly 38 pages of the book without stopping, then getting up and doing something completely different. Surely now I'm not an ugly despicable multi-tasker right?

    Putting aside the fact that episodes in Ulysses are difficult to distinguish, there being no very clear divide between them, my edition leaves half a blank page and the style of writing changes ... I think you would still be multi-tasking.

    I mean think of it this way, when was the last time when you read a book 40 pages at a time and interspersed with various other activities and when you were done you still knew what it was about? It's much easier to argue that reading a book should be one task, at worst, you could divide it into reading chapters when the book is structured appropriately.

    But inadvertently, you divided a task into more tasks so that you could do more than one main task per unit of time. The fact that this unit of time was a day or a week doesn't matter, you were still multi-tasking.

    And pray forbid you did anything while the stew is brewing, you insane multi-tasker! ;)

    The fact of the matter is, there is a reason round-robin (or a version of such) is the most successful task scheduling algorithm for processors. It allows a person (or a CPU) to do the most tasks in the shortest amount of time. Even though individual tasks take longer (you'd read the book in a week or two instead of a day or two), the average amount of time for completing a task is still shorter than with either FIFO, LIFO or SJF schedulers and there's no chance for starvation to occur.

    So now that we've established multi-tasking is very very good as long as you schedule big enough time slices per task, perhaps we can settle this debate and everyone will get back to work rather than continue debating whether they should unitask or multitask.

    Or maybe I should ask the Internet a question: Where exactly is the line between multi- and uni- tasking?

    PS: writing this blogpost took me 35 minutes, in this time I looked at the books on my desk several times, I also stopped to flip through Ulysses, then I grokked the wikipedia article about it, while writing I also listened to music, I also took some time to quickly refresh my knowledge of task scheduling algorithms to make sure I used the appropriate simile. I hope I shan't be chastised as a dirty multi-tasker for performing so many things in such a short amount of time.

    Enhanced by Zemanta

    Did you enjoy this article?

    Published on January 24th, 2011 in Arts, Computer multitasking, James Joyce, Literature, productivity, Reading, Ulysses, Uncategorized,

    Learned something new?
    Read more Software Engineering Lessons from Production

    I write articles with real insight into the career and skills of a modern software engineer. "Raw and honest from the heart!" as one reader described them. Fueled by lessons learned over 20 years of building production code for side-projects, small businesses, and hyper growth startups. Both successful and not.

    Subscribe below 👇

    Software Engineering Lessons from Production

    Join Swizec's Newsletter and get insightful emails 💌 on mindsets, tactics, and technical skills for your career. Real lessons from building production software. No bullshit.

    "Man, love your simple writing! Yours is the only newsletter I open and only blog that I give a fuck to read & scroll till the end. And wow always take away lessons with me. Inspiring! And very relatable. 👌"

    ~ Ashish Kumar

    Join 15,883+ engineers learning lessons from my "raw and honest from the heart" emails.

    ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️✨
    4.5 stars average rating

    Have a burning question that you think I can answer? Hit me up on twitter and I'll do my best.

    Who am I and who do I help? I'm Swizec Teller and I turn coders into engineers with "Raw and honest from the heart!" writing. No bullshit. Real insights into the career and skills of a modern software engineer.

    Want to become a true senior engineer? Take ownership, have autonomy, and be a force multiplier on your team. The Senior Engineer Mindset ebook can help 👉 swizec.com/senior-mindset. These are the shifts in mindset that unlocked my career.

    Curious about Serverless and the modern backend? Check out Serverless Handbook, for frontend engineers 👉 ServerlessHandbook.dev

    Want to Stop copy pasting D3 examples and create data visualizations of your own? Learn how to build scalable dataviz React components your whole team can understand with React for Data Visualization

    Want to get my best emails on JavaScript, React, Serverless, Fullstack Web, or Indie Hacking? Check out swizec.com/collections

    Want to brush up on modern JavaScript syntax? Check out my interactive cheatsheet: es6cheatsheet.com

    Did someone amazing share this letter with you? Wonderful! You can sign up for my weekly letters for software engineers on their path to greatness, here: swizec.com/blog

    Want to brush up on your modern JavaScript syntax? Check out my interactive cheatsheet: es6cheatsheet.com

    By the way, just in case no one has told you it yet today: I love and appreciate you for who you are ❤️

    Created by Swizec with ❤️