Swizec Teller - a geek with a hatswizec.com

Senior Mindset Book

Get promoted, earn a bigger salary, work for top companies

Senior Engineer Mindset cover
Learn more

    I suck at implementing neural networks in octave

    A few days ago I implemented my first full neural network in Octave. Nothing too major, just a three layer network recognising hand-written letters. Even though I finally understood what a neural network is, this was still a cool challenge.

    Yes, even despite having so much support from ml-class ... they practically implement everything and just leave the cost and gradient functions up to you to implement. Then again, Octave provides tools for learning where you essentially just run a function, tell it where to find the cost and gradient function and give it some data.

    Then the magic happens.

    Getting the basic implementation to work is really simple since the formulas being used aren't all that complex:

    Neural network cost function Neural network backpropagation

    Here's the code I've come up with to get this working on a three layer network:

    function [J grad] = nnCostFunction(nn_params, ...
                                       input_layer_size, ...
                                       hidden_layer_size, ...
                                       num_labels, ...
                                       X, y, lambda)
    %NNCOSTFUNCTION Implements the neural network cost function for a two layer
    %neural network which performs classification
    %   [J grad] = NNCOSTFUNCTON(nn_params, hidden_layer_size, num_labels, ...
    %   X, y, lambda) computes the cost and gradient of the neural network. The
    %   parameters for the neural network are "unrolled" into the vector
    %   nn_params and need to be converted back into the weight matrices.
    %
    %   The returned parameter grad should be a "unrolled" vector of the
    %   partial derivatives of the neural network.
    %
    
    % Reshape nn_params back into the parameters Theta1 and Theta2, the weight matrices
    % for our 2 layer neural network
    Theta1 = reshape(nn_params(1:hidden_layer_size * (input_layer_size + 1)), ...
                     hidden_layer_size, (input_layer_size + 1));
    
    Theta2 = reshape(nn_params((1 + (hidden_layer_size * (input_layer_size + 1))):end), ...
                     num_labels, (hidden_layer_size + 1));
    
    % Setup some useful variables
    m = size(X, 1);
    
    % You need to return the following variables correctly
    J = 0;
    Theta1_grad = zeros(size(Theta1));
    Theta2_grad = zeros(size(Theta2));
    
    yy = zeros(size(y),num_labels);
    for i=1:size(X)
      yy(i,y(i)) = 1;
    end
    
    X = [ones(m,1) X];
    % cost
    for  i=1:m
      a1 = X(i,:);
      z2 = Theta1*a1';
      a2 = sigmoid(z2);
      z3 = Theta2*[1; a2];
      a3 = sigmoid(z3);
    
      J += -yy(i,:)*log(a3)-(1-yy(i,:))*log(1-a3);
    end
    
    J /= m;
    
    J += (lambda/(2*m))*(sum(sum(Theta1(:,2:end).^2))+sum(sum(Theta2(:,2:end).^2)));
    
    t=1;
    for t=1:m
      % forward pass
      a1 = X(t,:);
      z2 = Theta1*a1';
      a2 = [1; sigmoid(z2)];
      z3 = Theta2*a2;
      a3 = sigmoid(z3);
    
      % backprop
      delta3 = a3-yy(t,:)';
      delta2 = (Theta2'*delta3).*[1; sigmoidGradient(z2)];
      delta2 = delta2(2:end);
    
      Theta1_grad = Theta1_grad + delta2*a1;
      Theta2_grad = Theta2_grad + delta3*a2';
    end
    
    Theta1_grad = (1/m)*Theta1_grad+(lambda/m)*[zeros(size(Theta1, 1), 1) Theta1(:,2:end)];
    Theta2_grad = (1/m)*Theta2_grad+(lambda/m)*[zeros(size(Theta2, 1), 1) Theta2(:,2:end)];
    
    % Unroll gradients
    grad = [Theta1_grad(:) ; Theta2_grad(:)];
    
    end
    

    This then basically gets pumped into the fmincg function and on the other end a result pops out.

    Now, I've managed to vectorize this thing to the edge of my capabilities. But I know it's still just matrix multiplication so I know for a fact it should be possible to vectorize even further. Anyone know how to do that?

    Also, if you know of a cool way to generalize the algorithm so it would work on bigger networks, I'd love to hear about that as well!

    Published on November 15th, 2011 in Artificial intelligence, Machine learning, Neural network, Octave, Uncategorized

    Did you enjoy this article?

    Continue reading about I suck at implementing neural networks in octave

    Semantically similar articles hand-picked by GPT-4

    Senior Mindset Book

    Get promoted, earn a bigger salary, work for top companies

    Learn more

    Have a burning question that you think I can answer? Hit me up on twitter and I'll do my best.

    Who am I and who do I help? I'm Swizec Teller and I turn coders into engineers with "Raw and honest from the heart!" writing. No bullshit. Real insights into the career and skills of a modern software engineer.

    Want to become a true senior engineer? Take ownership, have autonomy, and be a force multiplier on your team. The Senior Engineer Mindset ebook can help 👉 swizec.com/senior-mindset. These are the shifts in mindset that unlocked my career.

    Curious about Serverless and the modern backend? Check out Serverless Handbook, for frontend engineers 👉 ServerlessHandbook.dev

    Want to Stop copy pasting D3 examples and create data visualizations of your own? Learn how to build scalable dataviz React components your whole team can understand with React for Data Visualization

    Want to get my best emails on JavaScript, React, Serverless, Fullstack Web, or Indie Hacking? Check out swizec.com/collections

    Did someone amazing share this letter with you? Wonderful! You can sign up for my weekly letters for software engineers on their path to greatness, here: swizec.com/blog

    Want to brush up on your modern JavaScript syntax? Check out my interactive cheatsheet: es6cheatsheet.com

    By the way, just in case no one has told you it yet today: I love and appreciate you for who you are ❤️

    Created by Swizec with ❤️