GraphQL for new projects looks great ... buuuut how do you use it with that old backend cobbled together in Rails over the last bazillion years?
Can you write an async function that returns some data? Great! That's all GraphQL needs. π€
No seriously, it's that simple.
You can connect GraphQL to your REST API instead of the database. Create a small proxy and start using GraphQL on the frontend today. No backend changes required.
We explored this idea on a stream π
Out came a proof of concept that took a 37KB payload from our production API at Yup and turned it into this:
π
Why wrap a production API in GraphQL
37KB for one request isn't even the biggest API payload we've got. It's just the most common π our entire settings object.
Nobody even knows which of those fields are still in use. Can't remove any because you might break an old client.
So forever more every client gets every setting that any client in history ever needed.
With a GraphQL proxy, each client can take just what it needs.
It works like this:
- Client sends GraphQL query
- GraphQL proxy gets query and maps it to the
settings
resolver - Resolver makes
fetch()
request to API - API returns full settings object
- GraphQL machinery matches object to query
- Proxy returns only the requested data
Want to combine multiple API requests into one? Now you can! Just send 2 queries in 1 request.
Users get a faster app and lower bandwidth usage.
You get an easier coding experience on the client and you empower frontend engineers to make better decisions.
Worried about the overhead of a GraphQL proxy?
Many requests can be cached and don't even have to hit your real backend.
Serverless Handbook for Frontend Engineers βΒ free chapter
Dive modern backend. Understand any backend.
Serverless Handbook taught me high-leveled topics. I don't like recipe courses and these chapters helped me to feel like I'm not a total noob anymore.
The hand-drawn diagrams and high-leveled descriptions gave me the feeling that I don't have any critical "knowledge gaps" anymore.
~ Marek C, engineer
Start with a free chapter and email crash course β€οΈ
How to wrap a REST API with GraphQL
- Create a GraphQL server
- Write query resolvers that poke your API
- Build GraphQL type definitions from your payloads
That last part is tedious, I'm sorry.
Wittern et al talk about Generating GraphQL-Wrappers for REST APIs in a 2018 paper, but I haven't found a good implementation in the wild yet. Hasura looks like a great approach, but they convert your Postgres schema into a GraphQL API, not your client-facing API.
How related are your Postgres and your REST API really? I bet you build those payloads from SQL queries, environment variables, helper methods, and all sorts of stuff.
WalmartLabs created a JSON-to-GraphQL library that works well for a first pass. I used it on the stream.
You could create a crawler that goes through your API and builds GraphQL type definitions. π€
Build a proof-of-concept to impress your boss.
After harping on and on that we need GraphQL and it will solve many of our problems, my team started getting tired of my shit. We can't do it, it's too hard, we don't want to change the backend, we ... screw you I'm building it.
here's what I found
serverless.yml
Host on AWS Lambda so you don't have to deal with servers. Focus on the code.
service: yup-graphql-proxy
provider:
name: aws
runtime: nodejs12.x
stage: dev
functions:
graphql:
handler: dist/graphql.handler
events:
- http:
path: graphql
method: GET
cors: true
- http:
path: graphql
method: POST
cors: true
Run sls deploy
and you get a server that runs your graphql.handler
method on every GET and POST request.
graphql.ts β Apollo AWS Lambda server
Apollo is great for building GraphQL servers. Good community support, integrates well with Lambda, great developer experience. π
// src/graphql.ts
import { ApolloServer, gql } from "apollo-server-lambda";
import { APIwrapper } from "./APIwrapper";
import { settingsSchema } from "./schema/Settings";
// this is where we define the shape of our API
const rootSchema = gql`
type Query {
// queries βΒ GET api
}
type Mutation {
// mutations βΒ POST api
}
`;
const typeDefs = [rootSchema, settingsSchema];
// a convenience wrapper for your API
const API = new APIwrapper();
// this is where the shape maps to functions
const resolvers = {
Query: {
// query resolvers go here
}
Mutation: {
// mutation resolvers go here
}
};
const server = new ApolloServer({ typeDefs, resolvers });
export const handler = server.createHandler({
cors: {
origin: "*", // for security in production, lock this to your real endpoints
credentials: true
}
});
This creates a GraphQL server. Send a POST request and it maps queries to resolvers. Send a GET request and you see an Apollo playground so you can try your queries.
schemas
Schemas represent the shape of your API.
This will take some manual work. I recommend a Query for every GET endpoint in your API and a Mutation for every POST/PUT/DELETE etc.
Then use something like the walmartlabs schema generator to build type definitions for each endpoint. Some might overlap and that's okay.
To keep code organized I recommend 1 schema file per endpoint β src/schema/Thing.ts
. Like this
src/schema/Settings.ts
import { gql } from "apollo-server";
// schema generated with: https://walmartlabs.github.io/json-to-simple-graphql-schema/
export const settingsSchema = gql`
type Reactions {
name: String
emoji: String
label: String
}
type Subtopics {
id: Int
name: String
label: String
}
type Subjects {
id: Int
name: String
blurb: String
available: Boolean
// ...
}
`;
There's 300 lines of this crap. You don't wanna write it by hand from scratch π
A crawler could be a good idea. Something you point at all the different endpoints and it collects those schema definitions.
You'll have to consolidate and clean up by hand.
combining all those schemas
Get all your schemas imported and into an array, pass them into ApolloServer as type definitions.
// src/graphql.ts
import { userSchema } from "./schema/User";
import { settingsSchema } from "./schema/Settings";
const rootSchema = gql`
type Query {
user: User
settings: Settings
}
`;
const typeDefs = [rootSchema, userSchema, settingsSchema];
const server = new ApolloServer({ typeDefs, resolvers });
Query user
returns the User
model, settings
for Settings
etc. Build a mapping that makes sense for your API.
Remember that you can extend type
in any schema to extend existing types. Great for adding queries and mutations.
map queries to REST requests with resolvers
Resolvers are where you map queries to data. Any data from anywhere. π€
For my settings proof-of-concept, it looks like this:
// src/graphql.ts
const API = new APIwrapper();
// this is where the shape maps to functions
const resolvers = {
Query: {
settings: async () => {
await API.login();
return API.settings();
}
}
// Mutation: {}
};
An API wrapper helps with authentication, staying logged in as a user, and sending the right headers with each request.
The API.settings()
method sends a fetch request to /api/settings
and returns the payload.
// src/APIwrapper.ts
import fetch from "isomorphic-fetch";
export class APIwrapper {
headers: JSONBlob = {
"Content-Type": "application/json",
Authorization: `Token token=<auth_token>`,
Accept: "application/json.v2"
};
async settings() {
await this.login();
const settings = await fetch("https://swizec.ngrok.io/api/settings", {
headers: this.headers
}).then(res => res.json());
return settings;
}
}
Hardcoded to my dev machine because this is just a prototype. You'd want that to be a setting or environment variable of some sort.
The headers also are hardcoded and I stripped the token before sharing.
My login method also is quite ratchet. It uses a demo user's email/pass combination to fake logging into the server. π€£
async login() {
if (this.headers["X-Has-User-Account"]) {
// already logged in, keep going
return;
}
const response: LoginResponse = await fetch(
"https://swizec.ngrok.io/api/login",
{
method: "POST",
headers: this.headers,
body: JSON.stringify({
user: {
email: "admin@localhost.com",
password: "Password1!"
}
})
}
).then(res => res.json());
// add login stuff to headers for other methods
this.headers = {
...this.headers,
"X-Has-User-Account": "true",
"X-User-Known-Key": response.identifier,
"X-User-Authentication-Token": response.access_token
};
}
You'll need to figure this part out for yourself. Authentication depends on your backend implementation. You might not even need it for some requests.
And that's how you wrap your REST API in a GraphQL
- GraphQL server
- Turn payloads into schema
- Map queries to endpoints
Where it gets tricky is preserving end-user authentication. You'd need to get cookie/token information from the client or run the login process through your proxy.
Large POST requests could look weird too.
We have some endpoints that accept a JSON blob with tens of parameters. Several kilobytes of data. Stuffing all of that into mutation arguments feels funny.
Maybe you could have 1 parameter that accepts a JSON string π€
If you decide to go down this route, expect a schlep followed by "Yay we have GraphQL now" from everyone else on your team. You'll be their hero.
I think it's worth it.
Cheers,
~Swizec
Continue reading about How you can start using GraphQL today without changing the backend
Semantically similar articles hand-picked by GPT-4
- REST API best practice in a GraphQL world
- How serverless beats servers
- How GraphQL blows REST out of the water
- Is hot dog taco?
- Modern backend is a JavaScript function
Want to dive into serverless? Not sure where to begin?
Serverless Handbook was designed for people like you getting into backend programming.
360 pages, 19 chapters, 6 full projects, hand-drawn diagrams, beautiful chapter art, best-looking cover in tech. βοΈ
Learn how to choose the right database, write cloud functions, think about scalability, gain the architecture mindsets for robust systems, and more.
Leave your email to start with a free chapter and email crash course π
Serverless Handbook for Frontend Engineers βΒ free chapter
Dive modern backend. Understand any backend.
Serverless Handbook taught me high-leveled topics. I don't like recipe courses and these chapters helped me to feel like I'm not a total noob anymore.
The hand-drawn diagrams and high-leveled descriptions gave me the feeling that I don't have any critical "knowledge gaps" anymore.
~ Marek C, engineer
Start with a free chapter and email crash course β€οΈ
Have a burning question that you think I can answer? Hit me up on twitter and I'll do my best.
Who am I and who do I help? I'm Swizec Teller and I turn coders into engineers with "Raw and honest from the heart!" writing. No bullshit. Real insights into the career and skills of a modern software engineer.
Want to become a true senior engineer? Take ownership, have autonomy, and be a force multiplier on your team. The Senior Engineer Mindset ebook can help π swizec.com/senior-mindset. These are the shifts in mindset that unlocked my career.
Curious about Serverless and the modern backend? Check out Serverless Handbook, for frontend engineers π ServerlessHandbook.dev
Want to Stop copy pasting D3 examples and create data visualizations of your own? Learn how to build scalable dataviz React components your whole team can understand with React for Data Visualization
Want to get my best emails on JavaScript, React, Serverless, Fullstack Web, or Indie Hacking? Check out swizec.com/collections
Did someone amazing share this letter with you? Wonderful! You can sign up for my weekly letters for software engineers on their path to greatness, here: swizec.com/blog
Want to brush up on your modern JavaScript syntax? Check out my interactive cheatsheet: es6cheatsheet.com
By the way, just in case no one has told you it yet today: I love and appreciate you for who you are β€οΈ